Written question asked by David Ruffley (Conservative) on Thursday, 21 April 2011, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 27 April 2011. It was answered by Crispin Blunt (Conservative) on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.
Crime: Nature Conservation
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many convictions there were for offences under wildlife protection legislation in each criminal justice area in the most recent year for which figures are available.
- Answer
-
The number of defendants found guilty at all courts for wildlife related offences, by police force area in England and Wales, 2009 (latest available) is shown in the following table.Court proceedings data for 2010 are planned for publication on 26 May 2011.
Number of defendants found guilty at all courts for wildlife related offences, by police force area 2009¹,²,³ Police force area Wildlife and Countryside Act 19814 Protection of Badgers Act 1992 Deer Act 1991 Control of Trade in Endangered (Enforcement) Species Regulation 1997 Conservation of Seals Act 1970 Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996 Avon and Somerset — — — — — — Bedfordshire — — — — — 1 Cambridgeshire 1 — — — — — Cheshire 2 5 — 1 — — City of London — — — — — — Cleveland — — — — — — Cumbria 2 — — — — — Derbyshire — — — — — — Devon and Cornwall 3 2 1 — — — Dorset 1 — — — — — Durham — — — — — — Essex 1 1 — — 7 — Gloucestershire — 1 — — — — Greater Manchester 1 — — — 1 — Hampshire — 1 — — — — Hertfordshire — 1 — — — — Humberside — — — — — — Kent — — — — — — Lancashire — 1 — — — — Leicestershire 2 — — — — — Lincolnshire 1 — — — 1 Merseyside 1 1 — — — 1 Metropolitan Police 2 — — — — — Norfolk — — — — — — North Yorkshire 2 — — — — — Northamptonshire — — — — — — Northumbria 2 — — — 4 — Nottinghamshire 1 2 — — — — South Yorkshire 1 — — — — — Staffordshire — — — — — — Suffolk 1 3 1 — — — Surrey — — — 1 1 — Sussex — — — — — 1 Thames Valley 1 — — — — — Warwickshire — — — — — — West Mercia 2 2 — 1 — — West Midlands — 1 — — — 1 West Yorkshire 3 — — — 1 — Wiltshire — — — — — — Dyfed-Powys 1 — — — — — Gwent 1 — — — — — North Wales 1 1 — — — — South Wales — 8 — — 1 — England and Wales 33 30 2 3 15 5 ¹ The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. ² Every effort is made to ensure (hat the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. ³ Only those forces are shown where data have been reported. 4 Excludes offence ““Protection of wild plants”” as it forms part of a miscellaneous code which cannot be identified separately. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 53497; 527 c795-8W
- Session
- 2010-12
- Subjects
- Crime Nature conservation
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-20 03:14:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1610078
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1610078
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1610078